Discuz! Board's Archiver

sk3eiu8kje 發表於 2013-5-30 19:23

cheapest vans shoes and then we d have sex

sodes in, they re not having sex and it looks like it may be the best thing that ever happened to their relationship.Enjoined by May s prescription to put their sex life on hold, they get a surprise evening alone together, courtesy of the grandparents. Rather than jump into bed that is, rather than feel smothered by the pressure to jump into bed they spend the evening with man and woman s best friend: TiVo, and a hot bath, respectively. Later, they go out for a couple s dinner and play a guessing game about who else is and isn t having sex. ( Very few, Dave guesses.) Suddenly, not having sex is their thing, in a positive way: it s a kind of mutual rebellion, in a culture that s fixated on sex.TMYLM quickly got a repuation as the dirty show, but so much of it is a commentary on how sex-saturated the rest of society is, and how relentless that can be. It s inescapable: it s at the ice cream shop, at clothing stores, at parties,[url=http://www.vanscheapshoesvans0.com]cheapest vans shoes[/url], in Chris Rock routines and in your computer. This isn t a prudish attitude, exactly: TMYLM clearly doesn t think that sex is bad or unhealthy. But it can be tyrannical, and this episode largely focused on the three therapy couples trying to escape it. Carolyn and Palek speed-selling their house to flee the site off their baby-making pneumatics. Jamie dragging Hugo to therapy because if they talked alone, we d fight, and then we d have sex, and I don t want to do that. And Dave and Katie finding,[url=http://www.vanscheapshoesvans0.com]Womens Vans Love Authentic[/url], in their disciplined sexlessness, that they can be freer and more fun with each other than we ve ever seen them. (This despite Katie s frenemy, Rita, trying obnoxiously to stoke her frustration: There they go the MILF hunter and the celibate coach. )Dave and Katie haven t come close to solving their problems, but they ve taken a step; if they aren t yet ready to have sex, they re at least asserting their power to deny it. In any revolution sexual or otherwise sometimes the hardest freedom to win is the freedom to opt out. Latest from our Partners  Parent Claims Anne Frank Is Too Pornographic For School  The Huffington PostUnidentified/ 1950s — Photo: National Gallery of ArtIncredibly, I m back on the road again, again. (Didn t I just get home?) I ll be checking back in tomorrow. But before I leave town I wanted to offer a comment or two on The Art of the American Snapshot, 1888-1978, a new show at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, which I caught an early look at a few weeks ago.This is a show that needed to be done, not merely to trace the development of home photography from the introduction of the Kodak camera in 1888, but to remind us all that the snapshot was the crucial contribution to the universal image bank from which so much of subsequent art is drawn. What it fed into in particular was the great postwar photographic revolution of Robert Frank, Garry Winogrand, Lee Friedlander, William Eggleston, etc., etc.They all worked with better cameras, mostly 33mms,[url=http://www.vanscheapshoesvans0.com]Vans LXVI Variable Deepgrey[/url], but with a vision rendered cockeyed by their immersion in images from the primordial ooze of photographic folk art — birthday party pictures, kids playing in the yard, people holding cakes, goofing for the camera, whatever. The awkward poses in the typical snapshot,[url=http://www.vanscheapshoesvans0.com]Vans Tony Trujillo TNT 5 Black Orange[/url], the vacant expressions, the odd juxtapositions of a head with a tree, it was all the stuff of a new kind of picture, one that unknowingly broke all the rules because the people who took them didn t know what the rules were, or even that there were any. Even Diane Arbus, with her grave and weighty portraits taken with a twin-lens Rolleiflex — no Instamatics for her — owes some of the strangeness to in her work to the demotic weirdness of the people she would have seen in snapshots all her life.The National Gallery show, which was curated by Sarah Greenough and Diane Waggoner, has a wonderfully weird and funny (in all senses) selection of snaps. I only wish it had been possible to combine them in later galleries with a few examples of Winogrand, Friedlander and so on, to show how an anti-aesthetic developed into, well, an aesthetic. It may not have been possible to do
Related articles:


頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.